Electrum bitcoin cash support

4 stars based on 52 reviews

There is written already a lot about it so we refer to some of those articles [1], [2] for those who are not familiar with the matter.

Why we decided to not list BCC as altcoin? We have initially considered to add BCC as altcoin but we decided not to do it for electrum bitcoin cash support reasons. As posted [3] a few days ago there are a few major concerns with BCC:. Furthermore we have basic requirements for adding an altcoin and those have not been fulfilled:. Finally it would take precious time to test a new release and do the deployment. Time we consider better invested in other work.

If in the future project decides differently, then ok, but for now this is simply the case and will stay this way until further notice. It is simply project protecting itself the best it knows how.

ManfredKarrer, you are getting your info only from electrum bitcoin cash support censored resources and trolls on twitter, this by thinking that you are in good faith.

Did you electrum bitcoin cash support this? They used the PoS of Bitstamp and have forgotten to change the name Bitstamp in the text. How hard is it to do that basic search for existing ticker symbols? Again, you are talking about Viabtc.

The team behind Electrum Cash now Electron Cash has been in contact with with Thomas Voegtlin all the electrum bitcoin cash support days to fix with this problem, and it seems that they arrived to agreement. You should see that this is a completely broken logic in a situation with censorship.

I think that you are very naive. Sorry to hear your response. I respect you a lot for your early and electrum bitcoin cash support support for Bisq. Would have loved to see you as DAO genesis receiver. The block size civil war has created quite a lot of damage…. I think Bitcoin Cash is a distraction, and that it is being launched solely to protect the interests electrum bitcoin cash support BitMain.

For others, I am a beacon of reason. Regardless, however, I would have expected a more apolitical resolution to whether Bitcoin Cash should be listed on bisq. Several of the altcoins already available on bisq have shady origins premines, useless clones of other projects etc.

Therefore, it appears that Bitcoin Cash has been singled out for a political reason. I think this is unfortunate in the case of bisq unlike a privately held exchangeas it is all about decentralization and, soon, decentralized governance. I think that Bitcoin Cash should be given the same opportunity to be listed on bisq as any other altcoin. I know of course this is the case anyhow, until the DAO is successfully launched. Still, it sends the wrong signal to existing and future bisq users.

I am sure that time will tell. Electrum bitcoin cash support it turns out to have a decent replay protection and our first and only developer has a change of electrum bitcoin cash support. But Bitcoin Cash might also just flop as a crytpocurrency in a first week and no one uses it.

Who knows, we shall see what the future holds…. But so far that is not the case. I have posted quite a bit of background why I consider them un-ethical and bad for Bitcoin.

I am also surprised and disappointed that so few people are not more critical with the privacy implications if a huge portion of Bitcoin holders would move their coins and merge them together to exchange them for a few bucks.

Is it so easy to manipulate Bitcoiners with triggering their greed to get a few bucks and risk their own privacy as well as reduce the anonymity set of the whole Bitcoin ecosystem?

That hurts the fungibility of Bitcoin and thus the electrum bitcoin cash support. Chain analysis companies will celebrate. To support an altcoin which might cause considerable damage in that area, is for me a strong reason to not support it.

Sure you can see that as a kind of my personal opinion, but above are clearly stated requirements we have in place and those are not met at all. ManfredKarrer you are an idealist in a cynical world. Try to prepare for that. For now most people just see financial opportunities in the crypto-world and deny any political extensions. People just want the bucks without the politics.

Who cares if their privacy might be compromised by connecting two coins when at the same time they get a chance to double their wealth? Anyways - I electrum bitcoin cash support want to add that I am a absolute fan of big blocks and do not like Segwit very much because it is not a scaling solution and secondly it makes things very complex and difficult.

Electrum bitcoin cash support mentioned that many times. I am also a strong believer in this decentralized market place and will support it with or without immediate BitcoinCash integration. BCH is now the third biggest cryptocoin according to https: And this fact alone will make it necessary to integrate it former or later. Sadly Bisq missed the initial first mover opportunity to trade BCH at this time when many want to trade it but most markets are not ready now.

It would be good for everyone to go down to the facts instead of producing propaganda and spice it with their distracted emotions. It should be obvious to any Bitcoin user that he exposes himself to the world as soon as he spends his coins if not even before. Please think twice about it. Well, I guess you could just go ahead and fork bisq to run on Bcash rather than Bitcoin if you really need it.

With 1st of August a hard fork of Bitcoin will be released - Bitcoin Cash. Bisq will not add BCC as altcoin. If you have a BCC wallet which supports BIP electrum bitcoin cash support you can use the seed words for importing, otherwise you need to import the private keys.

As posted [3] a few days ago there are a few major concerns with BCC: Risk for users privacy and lowering Bitcoins fungibility by a large-scale coin merge in case many Bitcoin users would engage in BCC exchange moving and merging previously not connected funds. Setting a precedence for that model to fork off the Bitcoin network with an Electrum bitcoin cash support do we want to see that every month now? Lack of trust in their technically ability to provide a secure replay protection Beside that they acted highly unprofessional in several areas: We also consider their activities unethical: We see that as an attempt of hijacking an established brand.

Furthermore we have basic requirements for adding an altcoin and those have not been fulfilled: The Coin operators need to make the request They have to provide a pull request for the address validation and more… Finally it would take precious time to test a new release and do the deployment.

Lack of trust in their technically ability to provide a secure replay protection Did you see this? You are talking about Viabtc. You should really stop living in your closed box. The requirements for all altcoins have not been met at all: If the privacy argument is not clear here is more background info: Try not to be disappointed by how things will evolve.

I mentioned that many electrum bitcoin cash support I am also a strong believer in this decentralized market place and will support it with or without immediate BitcoinCash integration. I request it now the faster the better because many want to trade it? It should be obvious to any Bitcoin user that he exposes himself to the world as soon as he spends his coins if not even before sadly - Bisq is really giving up its biggest opportunity to penetrate the market quickly.

7950 vapor x litecoin news

  • Dogecoin block reward

    Bitcoin mining usb price

  • Bitcoin cash vs bitcoin core wallet

    Gratis trading bot btce

Biggest bitcoin exchange in india

  • Euro to bitcoin exchange rate

    Gwei ethereum phase blade

  • Mining bitcoin adalah tupai

    Mtgox bitcoin wallet address

  • Stock market liquidation

    Litecoin fpga design forum

Symbols liquide rincage lave vaisselle samsung

16 comments Is solo bitcoin mining profitable homebased

Gmail bot maker

Need help paying a BitPay invoice? Don't know how to pay to a payment URL? Check out our payment guide. The price of bitcoin is always changing. To prevent those price changes from hurting our merchants or users, BitPay requires transactions to be sent within fifteen minutes. Most bitcoin exchanges cannot send a payment that quickly. As a result, the payment can arrive late and need to be refunded.

This will cost you time and money. These non-Payment Protocol wallets make it too easy to send the incorrect amount of bitcoin. For that reason, BitPay now requires all payments to be made with a Payment Protocol compatible software or hardware wallet. If you don't have one of these wallets yet, simply create a wallet please use the current release version and send some bitcoin to it. The following wallets are fully compatible. We are currently working to add more fully-compatible wallets.

Our goal isn't to limit users' wallet choices. We require Payment Protocol-compatible wallets to protect users from common, expensive and sometimes irreversible payment mistakes. We continue to work with other wallet providers in the Bitcoin ecosystem to advance adoption of the Bitcoin Payment Protocol. We have released a simpler JSON interface for Payment Protocol which will make it easier for wallets to adopt these improvements.

We're encouraged by the response we have received. Widespread adoption of Payment Protocol will immediately improve the bitcoin payment experience. As more wallets adopt support for Payment Protocol payments, we will update our compatible wallet list. Watch our video tutorial here on how to move funds from an exchange to a bitcoin wallet for spending. Check out our guides to paying: What about other popular wallets?

How do I move bitcoin to a Payment Protocol-compatible spending wallet? Article is closed for comments.