Hackers using eternalblue exploit in cryptocurrency mining malware to mine monero using vulnerable w

4 stars based on 76 reviews

Financially motivated threat actors will continue to use malware infections to deploy cryptocurrency mining software for as long as it remains profitable. Compared to complete loss of availability caused by ransomware and loss of confidentiality caused by banking trojans or other information stealers, the impact of unauthorized cryptocurrency mining on a host is often viewed as more of a nuisance.

However, the cumulative effect of large-scale unauthorized cryptocurrency mining in an enterprise environment can be significant as it consumes computational resources and forces business-critical assets to slow down or stop functioning effectively. Furthermore, the deployment and persistence of unauthorized cryptocurrency mining software in an environment reflects a breakdown of effective technical controls.

If activity of this nature can become established and spread laterally within the environment, then more immediately harmful threats such as ransomware could as well. The technical controls used to mitigate the delivery, persistence, and propagation of unauthorized cryptocurrency miners are also highly effective against other types of threat. Although Bitcoin was reportedly used to purchase goods for the first time in Mayserious discussions of its potential as an accepted form of currency began inwhich coincided with the emergence of other cryptocurrencies.

There were approximately 1, cryptocurrencies as of December with new currencies added every day, although many cryptocurrencies cannot be mined. The price and volatility of popular cryptocurrencies surged in late see Figure 1. Market price of various cryptocurrencies from January to March Miners receive cryptocurrency as a reward and as an incentive to increase the supply of miners.

Consequently, cryptocurrency mining can be profitable for as long as the reward outweighs the hardware and energy costs.

Aggregating computing power, and then splitting any rewards received among the contributors, is a more profitable way of mining cryptocurrency than individual efforts.

Pools are not required to disclose information about the number of active miners in their pool, making it difficult to estimate the number of active miners and mining applications. Cryptocurrency is attractive to financially motivated threat actors as a payment method and as a way to generate revenue through mining:.

Reports of Bitcoin mining as a criminal activity emerged in as Bitcoin became widely known. Between andthere were several notable developments in cryptocurrency mining malware:. Threat actors exploit any opportunity to generate revenue, and their activity can affect unknowing facilitators as well as the end victim. The impact to an individual host is the consumption of processing power; IR clients have noted surges in computing resources and effects on business-critical servers.

This impact is amplified in large-scale infections. XMRig cryptocurrency miner running as local service on an infected host. XMRig accepts several variables as inputs see Figure 4including the wallet, a username and password if required, and the number of threads to open on the system.

Figure 5 illustrates the impact on an idling host when the miner uses four threads to consume spare computing capacity. Over time, this performance load forces the host to work harder, which also generates higher energy costs. After gaining the ability to run software on a compromised system, a threat actor chooses how to monetize the system. InCTU researchers reported that many financially motivated threat actors had shifted to using ransomware rather than traditional banking trojans, which have higher costs in terms of malware development and maintaining money muling networks.

Cryptocurrencies facilitated the hackers using eternalblue exploit in cryptocurrency mining malware to mine monero using vulnerable w of ransomware by making payment tracking and account disruption more difficult. However, there is a significant chance that victims will not pay the ransom, and that ransomware campaigns will receive law enforcement attention because the victim impact is immediate and highly visible. In contrast, a victim may not notice cryptocurrency mining as quickly because it does not require capitulation, its impact is less immediate or visible, and miners do not render data and systems unavailable.

These factors may make mining more profitable than deploying ransomware. If the threat actor manages resource demands so that systems do not crash or become unusable, they can deploy miners alongside other threats such as banking trojans to create additional revenue. Threat actors could also decide to deploy ransomware after mining cryptocurrency on a compromised network for a final and hackers using eternalblue exploit in cryptocurrency mining malware to mine monero using vulnerable w value payment before shifting focus to a new target.

Secureworks iSensor telemetry between and related to Bitcoin and the popular Stratum mining protocol indicates an increase in mining activity across Secureworks clients. Intrusion detection system events are not a reliable indicator over time due to the addition of clients and better detections as network countermeasures evolve.

There was a noticeable acceleration around October Bitcoin price compared to iSensor detections for Bitcoin network traffic on Secureworks client networks between December and February Client telemetry shows a similar increase in CoinHive traffic since its launch in September While CoinHive activity is typically a legitimate, if sometimes controversial, form of revenue generation, organizations need to consider how to manage the impact to corporate systems.

Secureworks IR analysts often find cryptocurrency mining software during engagements, either as the primary cause of the incident or alongside other malicious artifacts. Most identified cryptocurrency miners generate Monero, probably because threat actors believe it provides the best return on investment. Unlike Bitcoin, Monero makes mining more equitable for computers with less computational power, which is suitable for exploiting a large number of standard corporate computing assets.

The techniques that Secureworks IR analysts have observed threat actors using to install and spread miners in affected environments align with common methods that CTU researchers have encountered in other types of intrusion activity.

Threat actors will use the most effective techniques to create a large network of infected hosts that mine cryptocurrency. Legitimate cryptocurrency miners are widely available. Underground forums offer obfuscation, malware builders, and botnet access to hide illegitimate mining see Figure 7.

Forum advertisement for builder applications to create cryptocurrency mining malware. Initial access and installation often leverage an existing malware infection that resulted from traditional techniques such as phishing. Secureworks IR analysts commonly identify mining malware alongside downloader scripts or other commodity threats such as Trickbot that could be used to build botnets or download additional payloads.

Attackers could exploit weak authentication on externally facing services such as File Transfer Protocol FTP servers or Terminal Services also known as Remote Desktop Protocol RDP via brute-force attacks or by guessing the default password to gain access. Threat actors could also exploit remote code execution vulnerabilities on external services, such as the Oracle WebLogic Server, to download and run mining malware.

Social media platforms such as Facebook Hackers using eternalblue exploit in cryptocurrency mining malware to mine monero using vulnerable w and trojanized mobile apps have been abused to deliver a cryptocurrency miner payload. Because each instance of cryptocurrency mining malware slowly generates revenue, persistence is critical to accumulate significant returns. CTU researchers have observed a range of persistence techniques borrowed from traditional malware, including Windows Management Instrumentation WMI event consumers, scheduled tasks, autostart Windows services, and registry modifications.

For example, threat actors have set cron jobs on Linux systems to periodically download mining software onto the compromised host if it is not already present see Figure 8. A threat actor could also minimize the amount of system resources used for mining to decrease the odds of detection. Script setting cron job to periodically download and run mining software if not already present on Linux host. Miner malware payloads are often propagated using lateral movement. Threat actors have used malware that copies itself to mapped drives using inherited permissions, created remote scheduled tasks, used the SMBv1 EternalBlue exploit, and employed the Mimikatz credential-theft tool.

In one incident, threat actors added iframe content to an FTP directory that could be rendered in a web browser so that browsing the directory downloaded the malware onto the system. This technique has also been observed on Internet-facing websites. Recommendations provided during Secureworks IR engagements involving cryptocurrency malware. These recommendations address techniques used by cryptocurrency miners and threat actors in compromised environments.

Open RDP and other remote access protocols, or known vulnerabilities in Internet-facing assets, are often exploited for initial access. After compromising an environment, a threat actor could use PowerShell or remote scheduled tasks to install mining malware on other hosts, which is easier if the process attempting to access other hosts has elevated privileges.

The most effective means of identifying mining malware on infected hosts is through endpoint threat detection agents or antivirus software, and properly positioned intrusion detection systems can also detect cryptocurrency mining protocols hackers using eternalblue exploit in cryptocurrency mining malware to mine monero using vulnerable w network connections.

Comprehensive and centralized logging is critical for a response team to understand the scale and timeline of an incident when mining malware has infected multiple hosts. Network defenders should incorporate the following tactical mitigations into their overall security control framework. These mitigations are effective against a broad range of threats:.

Cryptocurrency mining is an attractive proposition for threat actors seeking to monetize unauthorized access to computing resources. It will remain a threat to organizations as long as criminals can generate profit with minimal overhead and risk. There has been a significant increase in cryptocurrency mining activity across the Secureworks client base since July Although cryptocurrency malware may not seem as serious as threats such hackers using eternalblue exploit in cryptocurrency mining malware to mine monero using vulnerable w ransomware, it can have a significant impact on business-critical assets.

Organizations should ensure that appropriate technical controls are in place. The mitigations for installation, persistence, and lateral movement techniques associated with cryptocurrency malware are also effective against commodity and targeted threats. No Ifs and Buts About It. Zavodchik, Maxim and Segal, Liron. Research Cryptocurrency Mining Malware Landscape.

Key points This threat can have a significant impact. If critical and high-availability assets are infected with cryptocurrency mining software, then computational resources could become unusable for their primary business function. Heavy processing loads could accelerate hardware failure, and energy costs could be significant for an organization with thousands of infected hosts.

Unauthorized cryptocurrency mining indicates insufficient technical controls. If it is possible for an initial malware infection to deliver and spread cryptocurrency miners within an environment without being detected, then that same access vector could be used to deliver a wide range of other threats. The threat of cryptocurrency mining malware increased in Financially motivated threat actors are drawn to its low implementation cost, high return on investment, and arguably lower risk of law enforcement action than traditional malware because the impact is less visible or disruptive.

The upward trend of cryptocurrency miner infections will continue while they offer a positive return on investment. Threat actors may carefully manage the impact on an infected host to reduce the likelihood of detection and remediation. Organizations should also establish a position on legal forms of cryptocurrency mining such as browser-based mining. While this form of mining has a legitimate use, organizations might still consider it an unacceptable use of corporate resources.

Cryptocurrency mining criminality Cryptocurrency is attractive to financially motivated threat actors as a payment method and as a way to generate revenue through mining: The decentralized nature of many cryptocurrencies makes disruptive or investigative action by central banks and law enforcement challenging.

Multiple cryptocurrencies promote anonymity as a key feature, although the degree of anonymity varies. For example, security researchers were able to analyze publicly viewable records of Monero payments made to the Shadow Brokers threat group for their leaked tools. For criminals with control of an infected system, cryptocurrency mining can be done for free by outsourcing the energy costs and hardware demands to the victim. Access to networks of infected computers can be sold as a service.

Cryptocurrency miners can be combined with threats such as information stealers to provide additional revenue. Organizations may not detect and respond quickly to cryptocurrency mining because they consider it less hackers using eternalblue exploit in cryptocurrency mining malware to mine monero using vulnerable w and immediately disruptive than other malicious revenue-generating activity such as ransomware.

As a result, threat actors have more time to generate revenue and law enforcement may take longer to react. Between andthere were several notable developments in cryptocurrency mining malware: Cryptocurrency mining malware developers quickly incorporated highly effective techniques for delivery and propagation.

Mineral dogecoin price in india

  • Blockchain consulting ltd

    Hp dl380 g5 power supply bitcoin price in india

  • Blockchain technology insurance amtrust

    Bitcoin exchange nicehash hacked $68 million stolen

Ethereum mit zwischenzeitlichen kapazittsproblemen

  • Cuda miner dogecoin exchange

    Bonus bitcoin faucet free

  • Recombination rate calculator drosophila

    The best results in the binary option trading robottrading oil options

  • Ethereum wallpapers

    Bitcoin mining equipment requirements for firefox

Kraken exchange reviews live markets guides bitcoin charts

25 comments Fbi bitcoin wallet comments definition

Celent blockchain bitcoin

While the world is holding its breath, wondering where notorious cybercriminal groups like Lazarus or Telebots will strike next with another destructive malware such as WannaCryptor or Petya, there are many other, less aggressive, much stealthier and often very profitable operations going on. One such operation has been going on since at least May , with attackers infecting unpatched Windows webservers with a malicious cryptocurrency miner. To achieve this, attackers modified legitimate open source Monero mining software and exploited a known vulnerability in Microsoft IIS 6.

Over the course of three months, the crooks behind the campaign have created a botnet of several hundred infected servers and made over USD 63, worth of Monero. While far behind Bitcoin in market capitalization, Monero has several features that make it a very attractive cryptocurrency to be mined by malware — untraceable transactions and a proof of work algorithm called CryptoNight, which favors computer or server CPUs and GPUs, in contrast to specialized mining hardware needed for Bitcoin mining.

In particular, a specifically crafted PROPFIND request leads to a buffer overflow due to a reallocation of double sized buffer when the count of Unicode characters is mistakenly provided instead of a byte-count. A very detailed analysis of the mechanism by Javier M. The payload comes necessarily in the form of an alphanumeric string. The attackers replaced the string leading to the execution of the Windows calculator from the proof-of-concept with one leading to the download and execution of their malicious payload.

Since then, it has been appearing in waves, on a weekly or less frequent basis, which implies that the attacker scans the internet for vulnerable machines. Scanning is always done from one IP address, which seems to be a machine hosted on an Amazon cloud server that the attacker had rented and deployed their scanning software on. This is a real-world example of a packet that would be blocked:.

The good news is that despite the end-of-life status of the system, Microsoft decided to patch these critical vulnerabilities in order to avoid large-scale destructive attacks similar to the WannaCry outbreak. Consequently, a large portion of these systems are still vulnerable to this day. Thanks to the mining pool stats being publicly available, we were able to see the combined hash rate of all victims, which represents the computing power dedicated to the mining account.

Overall, the infected machines were making approximately XMR5. The attackers were very active at the end of August but have gone quiet since early this month with no new infections coming in. This is not the first time the attackers took such a break and it is likely a new campaign will be launched in the near future.

The total number of victims is not known to us, but can be estimated from the total hash rate produced by the attacker. However, considering the fact that the exploit is limited to systems running Windows Server , which will most likely be running on older hardware with weaker CPUs, the average hash rate per victim will be much lower and the total number of infected machines probably much higher. We see that minimal know-how together with very low operating costs and a low risk of getting caught — in this case, misusing legitimate open-source cryptocurrency mining software and targeting old systems likely to be left unpatched — can be sufficient for securing a relatively high outcome.

I think you have a typo at the beginning: You are commenting using your WordPress. You are commenting using your Twitter account.

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Notify me of new comments via email. Notify me of new posts via email. Why mine Monero and not Bitcoin? Graph of infection waves over time Scanning is always done from one IP address, which seems to be a machine hosted on an Amazon cloud server that the attacker had rented and deployed their scanning software on.

This is a real-world example of a packet that would be blocked: Statistics Thanks to the mining pool stats being publicly available, we were able to see the combined hash rate of all victims, which represents the computing power dedicated to the mining account. Hackers que explotan servidores de Microsoft para minar Monero. Hackers infectan cientos de servidores con Windows Server para minar criptomonedas. Malware Patrol — protection against crypto mining abuse Malware Patrol.

Firedot - Network honeypot sensor WTB: Hackers mineram moeda digital nos servidores da Microsoft - PortaldoSaber. Leave a Reply Cancel reply Enter your comment here Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Email required Address never made public.

Post was not sent - check your email addresses! Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.